Short answer

There isn't a native fortnightly frequency yet. The supported workaround is to create two monthly routines over the same assets, offset by about two weeks (e.g. one due on the 1st of each month, the other on the 15th). Between them they fire roughly every two weeks. Native fortnightly is on the roadmap.

Detail

The recurrence options are Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Bi-monthly (every two months), and so on — but not "every two weeks". Councils whose grounds-maintenance contract specifies a fortnightly cut (common April–October) hit this gap.

The workaround:

  1. Create the routine as normal — bulk-select the assets, pick Monthly, set the type (usually Job), assign it.
  2. Set its due date to, say, the 1st of the month.
  3. Create a second monthly routine over the same assets, set its due date to roughly the 15th.
  4. Name them so the pair is obvious, e.g. "Area 1 — Cut pitches (1st)" and "Area 1 — Cut pitches (15th)".

The two monthlies together approximate a fortnightly cycle.

Note the difference between Bi-monthly and fortnightly: Bi-monthly means every two months (a reduction in frequency), not twice a month. If a contract says the cut should be more frequent in summer, Bi-monthly April–October is almost certainly a schedule error — summer should be the higher-frequency window (fortnightly), dropping to monthly over winter.

Watch-outs

  • Don't reach for Bi-monthly thinking it means "twice a month" — it's every two months. Mixing the two up flips a summer-heavy cutting regime into a summer-light one.
  • The two-monthly hack means two routines to maintain per area. When native fortnightly ships, consolidate them.
  • A workaround schedules the work — it doesn't change a cadence obligation. If your insurer or a contract mandates a weekly check (playgrounds and skate parks often carry a weekly-visual requirement), running the inspection fortnightly leaves a genuine compliance shortfall no matter how you model it. Match the routine to the required frequency, not just to how often a contractor happens to attend — and if the two differ, close the gap (e.g. train an internal person to do the alternate-week visual) rather than assume the schedule covers you. Confirm the exact wording with your own policy/assessor.
  • If you only need the higher frequency for part of the year (e.g. fortnightly April–October, monthly November–March), model the two seasons separately — see the seasonal-recurrence Q&A.